plum
git clone https://git.pyrossh.dev/plum
A statically typed, imperative programming language inspired by rust, python
4f1f2b6
— Peter John
2026-07-20T21:06:10+05:30
docs: add design spec for closures
docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-20-closures-design.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Closures (`|params| body`)
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Problem
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
`closure` (`|params| body`) already exists as a tree-sitter grammar rule but is unreachable from
|
|
6
|
+
any parse path — it's referenced only in a comment inside `expression`'s choice list. There is
|
|
7
|
+
also no function-value type annotation syntax at all (something like `cb: fn(v: a) -> Bool`,
|
|
8
|
+
as used in the aspirational `libs/std/list.plum`, doesn't parse today). Without closures, any
|
|
9
|
+
higher-order method (`each`, `map`, `filter`, `reduce`, `sort`, ...) on a future `List`/`Map` has
|
|
10
|
+
no way to accept a callback, and `list.plum`'s actual usage (`this.each() |v| { res.write(v.to_str(),
|
|
11
|
+
sep) }`, capturing `res`/`sep` from the enclosing method) can't be expressed at all.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Scope
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
Full, capturing closures — not just non-capturing function values. `list.plum`'s real usage reads
|
|
16
|
+
enclosing-scope variables from inside a closure literal, so a "closures" feature that can't
|
|
17
|
+
capture wouldn't actually unblock the motivating use case.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
**Capture semantics: snapshot by value**, not live/shared mutable capture. A captured variable's
|
|
20
|
+
*current value* is copied into the closure's environment at the moment the closure literal is
|
|
21
|
+
evaluated; a later mutation to that variable in the enclosing scope is not visible inside an
|
|
22
|
+
already-created closure. This is simpler (no heap-boxed shared cells needed for ordinary locals)
|
|
23
|
+
and matches every known real usage (reading `res`/`sep`, not reassigning them from inside the
|
|
24
|
+
closure). Live/shared capture is explicitly out of scope — flagged here as a real semantic choice,
|
|
25
|
+
not an oversight, in case a future use case needs it.
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Design
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
### 1. Grammar (`tooling/tree-sitter-plum`)
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
- Uncomment `$.closure` in `expression`'s choice list (the rule itself — `"|" params "|" body` —
|
|
32
|
+
already exists and needs no changes).
|
|
33
|
+
- Add a new function-value type rule for param type annotations, using **positional types only**
|
|
34
|
+
(no param names in the annotation — types don't need names, and this stays consistent with the
|
|
35
|
+
existing type-list convention `List(a)`/`Pair(a, b)`): `fn(Int) -> Bool`, `fn(a) -> b`. Usable
|
|
36
|
+
wherever a param type currently appears (`each(cb: fn(a))`).
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
### 2. AST (`plum-core`)
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
- New `ast::Closure { params: Vec<String>, body: Block }`, added as `Expr::Closure(Box<Closure>)`.
|
|
41
|
+
- New `ast::ParamType::Fn(Vec<Type>, Option<Box<Type>>)` variant (param types, param positions
|
|
42
|
+
only — a class field storing a callback value is out of scope, not needed by any current
|
|
43
|
+
example or by `list.plum`'s actual usage, which only ever passes closures as call arguments).
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
### 3. Checker (`plum-checker`)
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
- `PlumType::TFun(Vec<PlumType>, Box<PlumType>)` already exists and models a closure's type
|
|
48
|
+
directly — no new `PlumType` variant needed.
|
|
49
|
+
- `infer_expr`'s new `Closure` arm: bind each closure param to a fresh `TVar` (matching this
|
|
50
|
+
checker's existing permissive style — it already never really unifies generic parameters, just
|
|
51
|
+
accepts them), infer the body against that environment, return `TFun(param_types, body_type)`.
|
|
52
|
+
- Calling a closure-typed parameter by name (`cb(x)`) already type-checks via the **existing**
|
|
53
|
+
`FnCall` inference path unmodified — `lookup(env, &call.name)` resolves any `TFun`-typed binding
|
|
54
|
+
in scope, regardless of whether it came from a top-level function or a local closure-typed
|
|
55
|
+
param. No changes needed there.
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
### 4. Codegen (`plum-wasm-codegen`)
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
This is the substantial part — wasm has no closures natively, so it needs:
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
- **New wasm sections**: a function table and an elements segment. `WasmModule` needs
|
|
62
|
+
`add_table`/element-segment support, which doesn't exist yet.
|
|
63
|
+
- **Compiling a closure literal**: every closure literal becomes its own real wasm function,
|
|
64
|
+
registered as a table element, with an **implicit first parameter** — the boxed
|
|
65
|
+
captured-environment pointer — exactly mirroring how a method already receives `self` as an
|
|
66
|
+
implicit first parameter. Inside the closure's compiled body, each captured variable is loaded
|
|
67
|
+
from a fixed offset within that env struct (same load mechanics already used for class fields).
|
|
68
|
+
- **Free-variable analysis**: at the point a closure literal appears in source, walk its body and
|
|
69
|
+
collect every referenced name that is NOT one of the closure's own declared params, a global, or
|
|
70
|
+
a function name — these are the captured variables, snapshotted by value.
|
|
71
|
+
- **Constructing the closure value**: at the closure literal's site, bump-allocate an env struct
|
|
72
|
+
sized to hold the captured variables' current values (same bump-allocator convention as class
|
|
73
|
+
instances), then bump-allocate a small `{table_index: i32, env_pointer: i32}` pair. The pointer
|
|
74
|
+
to that pair **is** the closure's runtime value — a single `i32`, consistent with every other
|
|
75
|
+
reference-shaped value in this compiler (class instances, payload-carrying enum variants).
|
|
76
|
+
- **Calling a closure value**: load `table_index` and `env_pointer` from the pointer, push
|
|
77
|
+
`env_pointer` then the real call arguments, then `call_indirect`. The wasm type index for
|
|
78
|
+
`call_indirect` is resolved from the **caller's** own already-concrete (monomorphized) call
|
|
79
|
+
site — a closure's internal capture layout is opaque to its caller, so calling a higher-order
|
|
80
|
+
function like `each` needs no new monomorphization mechanism: `each`'s own concrete
|
|
81
|
+
instantiation (via the existing generics pass) already fixes what signature any closure passed
|
|
82
|
+
to it must have, and the checker already enforces that at the call site.
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
## Testing plan
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
- **Grammar**: corpus tests for a closure literal parsing in expression position, and a
|
|
87
|
+
`fn(...)`-typed param annotation parsing correctly (both bracket-free positional-type forms:
|
|
88
|
+
`fn(Int) -> Bool`, `fn(a) -> b`).
|
|
89
|
+
- **Checker**: a closure's inferred `TFun` type flows correctly into a `TFun`-typed binding;
|
|
90
|
+
calling a closure-typed param type-checks via the unmodified `FnCall` path.
|
|
91
|
+
- **Codegen** (compiled and executed via `wasmtime`, matching existing style):
|
|
92
|
+
- A non-capturing closure passed to a function and called.
|
|
93
|
+
- A closure capturing one enclosing local, called after that local's value has changed in the
|
|
94
|
+
enclosing scope — proving the capture is a value snapshot at creation time, not a live
|
|
95
|
+
reference (the closure must see the OLD value, not the new one).
|
|
96
|
+
- A closure passed through an already-generic higher-order function (proving the two features
|
|
97
|
+
compose — the outer function is monomorphized per its own generic param as usual, and any
|
|
98
|
+
closure passed to it is called correctly via `call_indirect` regardless).
|
|
99
|
+
- **Examples**: a minimal, real end-to-end usage (e.g. a small `each`-like helper function taking
|
|
100
|
+
a `fn(a)` callback, called with both a non-capturing and a capturing closure).
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
## Out of scope
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
- A class field storing a closure value.
|
|
105
|
+
- Live/shared mutable capture (a closure seeing a later mutation to a captured variable) — see
|
|
106
|
+
"Capture semantics" above; this is a deliberate simplification, not a deferred requirement.
|
|
107
|
+
- Multiple closures with genuinely different captured-variable layouts needing different wasm
|
|
108
|
+
function *signatures* at the same `call_indirect` site — not expected to arise given the design
|
|
109
|
+
(the env pointer is always a single opaque `i32` regardless of what it points to), but noted as
|
|
110
|
+
an edge to watch during implementation.
|
|
111
|
+
- Rewriting `libs/std/list.plum`/`map.plum` to actually use this — a separate, subsequent
|
|
112
|
+
follow-up once closures exist.
|